Gaia Theory and the Anthropocene: Radical Contingency in the Posthuman Future

D. B. Dillard-Wright

Abstract


Good readings of the Gaia hypothesis of James Lovelock understand the theory as positing multiple, interlocking Earth systems, characterized by rapidly-changing feedback loops, in a way that is harmonious both with Darwinian evolution and contemporary climate science. The dawning of the geologic epoch of the Anthropocene offers little comfort for those who would like to preserve a providential role for human beings in the unfolding of planetary systems. The climate crisis and its attendant catastrophes demonstrate that human beings cannot control themselves, much less the Earth systems on which they depend. The Gaia hypothesis, properly understood, provides an insight into the shock of radical contingency, the realization that the Earth and life can go along perfectly well without human beings. The Gaia hypothesis provides a good framework for seeing the place of humanity at the dawn of the Anthropocene, a decentering of the human even as humanity alters every Earth system and biome.

 

Keywords: Latour; Lovelock; Gaia hypothesis; Posthumanism; Plastics; Systems theory

Full Text:

PDF

References


Arendt, Hannah. The Human Condition. 2nd Edition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998. (c. 1958). Print.

Armstrong, Stuart. Smarter than Us: The Rise of Intelligent Machines. Berkeley, CA: Machine Intelligence Research Institute, 2014. Print.

Broglio, Ron. “Heidegger’s Shepherd of Being and Nietzsche’s Satyr.” New Formations (2008): 124-136. Print.

Brooke, John L. Climate Change and the Course of Global History: A Rough Journey. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014. Print.

Brown, Peter G. “Are There Any Natural Resources?” In Water Ethics: Foundational Readings for Students and Professionals. Ed. Peter G. Brown and Jeremy J. Schmidt. Washington DC: Island Press, 2010. 203-220. Print.

Corcoran, Patricia L, Charles J. Moore, and Kelly Jazvac. “An anthropogenic marker horizon in the future rock record.” GSA Today 24, No. 6 (2014): pp 4-8. Print.

Dillard-Wright, David. “A Goddess-Based Path to a Sustainable Future.” Sutra Journal (April 2016). http://www.sutrajournal.com/a-goddess-based-path-to-a-sustainable-future-by-david-dillard-wright. Web. (Accessed December 1, 2018).

Eriksen M, Lebreton LCM, Carson HS, Thiel M, Moore CJ, Borerro JC, et al. (2014) Plastic Pollution in the World's Oceans: More than 5 Trillion Plastic Pieces Weighing over 250,000 Tons Afloat at Sea. PLoS ONE 9(12): e111913. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111913 Web. (Accessed December 1, 2018).

Farley, Joshua. “The Economic Crisis: The Limits of Twentieth-Century Economics and Growth.” In The Community Resilience Reader: Essential Resources for an Era of Upheaval. Ed. Daniel Lerch. Washington, DC: Island, 2017. 79-94. Print.

Glanz, James. “Power, Pollution, and the Internet.” New York Times, Sept. 22, 2012. http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/23/technology/data-centers-waste-vast-amounts-of-energy-belying-industry-image.html?_r=0 Web. (Accessed December 1, 2018).

Gorham, Eville. “Biogeochemistry: its origins and development.” Biogeochemistry 13, No. 3 (1991): 199-239. Print.

Hanson, Robin and Eliezer Yudkowsky. The Hanson-Yudkowsky AI-Foom Debate. Berkeley, CA: Machine Intelligence Research Institute, 2013.

Haraway, Donna J. Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2016. Print.

Hayles, N. Katherine. “Print is Flat, Code is Deep: The Importance of Media-Specific Analysis.” Poetics Today 25, No. 1 (2004): 67-90. Print.

Hume, David. Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion. Ed. Richard H. Hopkins. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1980 (c. 1775). Print.

Jamieson, Dale. Reason in a Dark Time: Why the Struggle Against Climate Change Failed—and What It Means for Our Future. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014. Print.

Klein, Naomi. This Changes Everything: Capitalism vs. The Climate. New York: Simon and Schuster, 2014. Print.

Latour, Bruno. Facing Gaia: Eight Lectures on the New Climatic Regime. Cambridge: Polity, 2017. Print.

Lovelock, James. Gaia: A New Look at Life on Earth. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000 (c. 1979). Print.

Matless, David. “Nature, the Modern, and the Mystic. Tales from Early Twentieth Century Geography.” Transactions of the British Institute of Geographers 16, No. 3 (1991): 272-286. Print.

Mazis, Glen. Humans, Animals, Machines: Blurring Boundaries. Albany, NY: SUNY Press, 2008. Print.

Paley, William. Natural Theology, or Evidences of the Existence and Attributes of the Deity Collected from the Appearances of Nature. Boston: Richardson, Lord, and Holbrook, 1831. Print.

Morton, Timothy. Ecology Without Nature: Rethinking Environmental Aesthetics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2007. Print.

Scranton, Roy. Learning to Die in the Anthropocene: Reflections on the End of a Civilization. San Francisco: City Lights, 2015. Print.

Sloterdijk, Peter. You must change your life. Trans. Wieland Hoban. Cambridge: Polity, 2013. Print.

Taleb, Nassim Nicholas. Antifragile: Things that Gain from Disorder. New York: Random House, 2014. Print.

Williams, George C. “Gaia, Nature Worship, and Biocentric Fallacies.” Quarterly Review of Biology 67, No. 4 (1992): 479-486. Print.

Yi, Lan and Hywel R. Thomas. “A review of research on the environmental impact of e-business and ICT.” Environment International 33, No. 6 (2007): 841-849. Print.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.