Book Review: Ecocriticism on the Edge: The Anthropocene as a Threshold Concept by Timothy Clark

  • Deepak Pandiaraj IIT Bombay
Keywords: book review, ecocriticism, literary criticism, anthropocene, anthropocentric

Abstract

In literary criticism, the term ‘ecocriticism’ is employed to capture the various aspects of the relation between literature and environment; it “expresses a desire to bring to the study of literature the concerns of ecopolitics”. Timothy Clark brings together his expertise in philosophy, literature and literary theory in addressing the question of ecocriticism, giving directions as well as discussing the possible challenges this task might encounter. He is dissatisfied equally with the global capitalist thinking that least bothers about the earth, with the anthropocentric tendencies inherent in postcolonial thinking, with the romanticists who want to preserve the forest and with the progressives interested in the rights of oppressed groups insofar as the solution each camp suggests does not first understand the intellectual challenges set forth by the recognition of the anthropocene epoch.

Author Biography

Deepak Pandiaraj, IIT Bombay

Deepak is a PhD candidate since 2014 in the Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, IIT Bombay on the theme ‘Heidegger and Communication: The Epistemic, Ontological and Transformative Dimensions of the Logos’. He holds a B.Tech degree in Metallurgical and Materials Engineering from NITK Surathkal, an MA and an M.Phil degrees from the Department of Communication and Centre for Neural and Cognitive Sciences respectively of the Central University of Hyderabad. His other current research interests are phenomenology, poststructuralism and philosophy and culture of communication. He is a UGC-NET Senior Research Fellow in Mass communication and Journalism (2014-2018).

Published
2019-03-31
How to Cite
Pandiaraj, D. (2019). Book Review: Ecocriticism on the Edge: The Anthropocene as a Threshold Concept by Timothy Clark. Sanglap: Journal of Literary and Cultural Inquiry, 5(2), 69-71. https://doi.org/10.35684/JLCI.2019.5208