The Censor’s “filthy synecdoche”:

Samuel Beckett and Censorship

Authors

  • Martin Schauss

Keywords:

Beckett, Censorship, Obscenity, Scatology, Resistance

Abstract

This article considers Beckett’s lively use of “offensive” material—sexual and faecal—as it stages a confrontation with censorship practices. Following recent political readings of Beckett’s work, the article argues that Beckett is interested in exposing the structural paradox at the heart of the censor’s position and the instability of institutionalised moral borders. It draws on the novels Molloy and Watt, among others, and reviews Beckett’s early essay “Censorship in the Saorstat.”

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Martin Schauss

Martin Schauss is a doctoral candidate at the University of Warwick, UK. His research focuses on questions of materiality and the object world within the prose of Samuel Beckett and W. G. Sebald. His research interests include European post-war literature, modernism, literary & critical theory (specifically, theories of new materialism and ecocriticism). Most recently, he has presented papers on the logic of material incorporation in Beckett’s works, and on ruins and catastrophism in Sebald’s The Rings of Saturn. He holds an MA in English from the University of Calgary, AB, and a Joint-Honours BA in English Literature and Journalism/Creative Writing from the University of Strathclyde, UK.

Downloads

Published

2021-10-29

How to Cite

Schauss, M. . (2021). The Censor’s “filthy synecdoche”:: Samuel Beckett and Censorship. Sanglap: Journal of Literary and Cultural Inquiry, 2(2), 193–216. Retrieved from http://sanglap-journal.in/index.php/sanglap/article/view/57