Is Critique “Universal”?:

Swift’s Drapier’s Letters and the Possibility of Universal Public Reason

Authors

  • Suvendu Ghatak

Keywords:

Swift, Parrhēsia, Censorship, Critique, Habermas, Foucault, Butler, Asad

Abstract

 

This article seeks to examine the dimension of “courage” or “risk” involved in the exercise of critique through a genealogical survey in relation to Michel Foucault’s work on Parrhēsia and an examination of Jonathan Swift’s Drapier’s Letters as an exemplar depicting the contours of “norm” in 18th century public discourse. The tension between norm, truth and freedom of speech would be brought out to examine the censorship, intrinsic to the foundation of universal public reason that is pointed out by Judith Butler in her critique of the Habermasian model of public discourse. The vocabulary of public discourse will be assessed to understand whether universal normativity can at all be achieved.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Suvendu Ghatak

Suvendu Ghatak is an M.Phil research scholar at the Department of English, Jadavpur University, Kolkata, India. He is working on the notion of “immanence” in the poetry of Ted Hughes and its relation to ecological thought. He is particularly interested in anti-pastoral writings, philosophies of language, Romanticism and human ecology.

Downloads

Published

2021-10-29

How to Cite

Ghatak, S. (2021). Is Critique “Universal”?:: Swift’s Drapier’s Letters and the Possibility of Universal Public Reason. Sanglap: Journal of Literary and Cultural Inquiry, 2(2), 152–169. Retrieved from https://sanglap-journal.in/index.php/sanglap/article/view/55